From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Jackson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 29, 1993
199 A.D.2d 1002 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)

Opinion

December 29, 1993

Appeal from the Onondaga County Court, Elliott, J.

Present — Callahan, J.P., Green, Fallon and Davis, JJ.


Judgment unanimously reversed on the law and new trial granted. Memorandum: The trial court erred in instructing the jury that "[r]easonable doubt must * * * be based entirely and absolutely upon some good, sound substantial reason" and that the People bore the burden of establishing guilt "to a reasonable degree of certainty" (see, People v Freeman, 193 A.D.2d 1117). We, therefore, reverse defendant's conviction and grant a new trial. The evidence, viewed in the light most favorable to the People (see, People v Contes, 60 N.Y.2d 620, 621), is sufficient to support defendant's conviction and the verdict is not against the weight of the evidence (see, People v Bleakley, 69 N.Y.2d 490, 495).

In view of our determination, we do not address defendant's remaining contentions.


Summaries of

People v. Jackson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 29, 1993
199 A.D.2d 1002 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
Case details for

People v. Jackson

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. SAYNORAL A. JACKSON…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Dec 29, 1993

Citations

199 A.D.2d 1002 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
605 N.Y.S.2d 590

Citing Cases

People v. Paris

The Court made the distinction that, where the term "substantial doubt" is employed not to suggest the…

People v. Myers

Judgment unanimously reversed on the law and new trial granted. Memorandum: The trial court erred by…