From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Jackson

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
Nov 14, 2018
166 A.D.3d 803 (N.Y. App. Div. 2018)

Opinion

2011–02447 Ind.No. 2035/09)

11-14-2018

The PEOPLE, etc., Respondent, v. Vance I. JACKSON, Appellant.

Vance I. Jackson, Alden, NY, appellant pro se. Timothy D. Sini, District Attorney, Riverhead, N.Y. (Rosalind C. Gray of counsel), for respondent. Richard L. Herzfeld, New York, NY, former appellate counsel.


Vance I. Jackson, Alden, NY, appellant pro se.

Timothy D. Sini, District Attorney, Riverhead, N.Y. (Rosalind C. Gray of counsel), for respondent.

Richard L. Herzfeld, New York, NY, former appellate counsel.

MARK C. DILLON, J.P., SHERI S. ROMAN, JEFFREY A. COHEN, ROBERT J. MILLER, JJ.

DECISION & ORDER

Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated May 17, 2017 ( People v. Jackson, 150 A.D.3d 1025, 55 N.Y.S.3d 338 ), affirming a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County, rendered February 8, 2011.

ORDERED that the application is denied.

The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel (see Jones v. Barnes, 463 U.S. 745, 103 S.Ct. 3308, 77 L.Ed.2d 987 ; People v. Stultz, 2 N.Y.3d 277, 778 N.Y.S.2d 431, 810 N.E.2d 883 ).

DILLON, J.P., ROMAN, COHEN and MILLER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Jackson

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
Nov 14, 2018
166 A.D.3d 803 (N.Y. App. Div. 2018)
Case details for

People v. Jackson

Case Details

Full title:The People of the State of New York, respondent, v. Vance I. Jackson…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department

Date published: Nov 14, 2018

Citations

166 A.D.3d 803 (N.Y. App. Div. 2018)
2018 N.Y. Slip Op. 7751
85 N.Y.S.3d 790

Citing Cases

Jackson v. Eckert

On November 14, 2018, the Second Department denied Petitioner's application because he “failed to establish…