From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Jackson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Sep 27, 1999
264 A.D.2d 857 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

Submitted June 11, 1999

September 27, 1999

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Jones, J.), rendered September 17, 1997, convicting him of reckless endangerment in the first degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

James Jackson, Brooklyn, N.Y., appellant pro se.

Charles J. Hynes, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Roseann B. MacKechnie and Cynthia Kean of counsel), for respondent.

SONDRA MILLER, J.P., CORNELIUS J. O'BRIEN, WILLIAM D. FRIEDMANN, ANITA R. FLORIO, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

"An indictment is multiplicitous when `two separate counts * * * charge the same crime' * * * Multiplicity does not exist, however, `if each count requires proof of an additional fact that the other does not'" ( People v. Demetsenare, 243 A.D.2d 777, 779-780, quoting People v. Kindlon, 217 A.D.2d 793, 794-795). Here, there is no multiplicity since the counts involved allege violations of different provisions of the Penal Law. Each count, therefore, requires proof of at least one fact that the others do not.

The defendant's remaining contentions are without merit.

S. MILLER, J.P., O'BRIEN, FRIEDMANN, and FLORIO. JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Jackson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Sep 27, 1999
264 A.D.2d 857 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

People v. Jackson

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. JAMES JACKSON, appellant. (Ind. No…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Sep 27, 1999

Citations

264 A.D.2d 857 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
695 N.Y.S.2d 582

Citing Cases

People v. Vazquez

In this case, there is no multiplicity since counts 3, 4, 5 and 6 each involved violation of a different…

People v. Sukhu

The defendant's contention that two of the counts of robbery in the first degree should have been dismissed…