From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Ivory

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 2, 1990
160 A.D.2d 730 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)

Opinion

April 2, 1990

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Giaccio, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The evidence adduced at the Mapp hearing established that the arresting officer received a radio transmission from the undercover officer with whom he was working stating that the undercover officer had just observed a black male, who was 6 feet 1 inch tall, slim, and sporting a beard, mustache and close cropped hair, sell drugs on the corner of 205th Street and Linden Boulevard. Three minutes later, the arresting officer arrived at that location and found the defendant, who was the only man on that corner who matched the description with which he had been provided. This evidence was sufficient to meet the People's burden of establishing that it was more likely than not that the defendant was the person observed selling drugs (see, People v. Skrine, 125 A.D.2d 507; People v. White, 117 A.D.2d 127). Thus, the hearing court did not err in concluding that there was probable cause for the defendant's arrest. Thompson, J.P., Brown, Rubin and Eiber, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Ivory

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 2, 1990
160 A.D.2d 730 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
Case details for

People v. Ivory

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. BERNARD IVORY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 2, 1990

Citations

160 A.D.2d 730 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
554 N.Y.S.2d 53

Citing Cases

People v. Toodles

on of numerous vials of crack cocaine (see, People v. Rosario, 78 N.Y.2d 583, cert denied ___ US ___, 117 L…

People v. Serrano

urt that the suppression of the transmitting officer's identification testimony was warranted under the…