From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Itchier

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 24, 2003
304 A.D.2d 480 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

Opinion

949

April 24, 2003.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Ronald Zweibel, J.), rendered January 28, 2002, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and criminal sale of a controlled substance in or near school grounds, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to concurrent terms of 5 to 10 years, unanimously affirmed.

Matthew J. Galluzzo, for respondent.

Robert S. Dean, for defendant-appellant.

Before: Tom, J.P., Saxe, Ellerin, Williams, Marlow, JJ.


The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v. Bleakley, 69 N.Y.2d 490). There is no basis for disturbing the jury's determinations concerning credibility. The totality of the evidence, including the fact that defendant initiated contact with the undercover officer, warranted the conclusion that defendant participated in the drug sale and did not merely supply general information as to where drugs could be obtained (see People v. Bello, 92 N.Y.2d 523).

We decline to invoke our interest of justice jurisdiction to dismiss the non-inclusory concurrent count (see People v. Spence, 290 A.D.2d 223,lv denied 98 N.Y.2d 641; People v. Kulakov, 278 A.D.2d 519, lv denied 96 N.Y.2d 785).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.


Summaries of

People v. Itchier

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 24, 2003
304 A.D.2d 480 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
Case details for

People v. Itchier

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. MICHAEL ITCHIER…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Apr 24, 2003

Citations

304 A.D.2d 480 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
758 N.Y.S.2d 324

Citing Cases

People v. Campbell

The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence ( see…