Opinion
March 20, 2001.
April 23, 2001.
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Cooperman, J.), rendered October 13, 1998, convicting him of enterprise corruption, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.
Ronna Gordon-Galchus, Bayside, N.Y., for appellant, and appellant pro se.
Richard A. Brown, District Attorney, Kew Gardens, N.Y. (John M. Castellano, Alyson J. Gill, and Michelle Wolf of counsel), for respondent.
Before: GABRIEL M. KRAUSMAN, J.P., WILLIAM D. FRIEDMANN, SANDRA J. FEUERSTEIN, NANCY E. SMITH, JJ.
DECISION ORDER
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.
Because the defendant received the sentence for which he bargained, he has no cause to complain on appeal (see, People v. Acevedo, 216 A.D.2d 476; People v. Kazepis, 101 A.D.2d 816). In any event, given the seriousness and scope of the criminal enterprise at issue, and the defendant's admitted significant participation therein, the sentence imposed was neither harsh nor excessive (see, People v. Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80).
The defendant's remaining contentions, raised in his supplemental pro se brief, are either waived, unpreserved for appellate review, not subject to review on a direct appeal from the judgment, or without merit.