From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Irizarry

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Dec 27, 2001
289 A.D.2d 875 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

Opinion

12735

Decided and Entered: December 27, 2001.

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Ulster County (Bruhn, J.), rendered December 14, 2000, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of manslaughter in the first degree.

Paul L. Gruner, Public Defender (Mari Ann Connolly Sennett of counsel), Kingston, for appellant.

Donald A. Williams, District Attorney (Joan Gudesblatt Lamb of counsel), Kingston, for respondent.

Before: Cardona, P.J., Mercure, Spain, Mugglin and Rose, JJ.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

Defendant pleaded guilty to the crime of manslaughter in the first degree for the beating death of his mother's ex-boyfriend and was sentenced, as part of a negotiated plea agreement, to a determinate term of 12½ years in prison. Defendant appeals, soley contending that his prison sentence is harsh and excessive. We disagree. A sentence within the statutory parameters will not be disturbed absent an abuse of discretion or extraordinary circumstances warranting a modification (see, People v. Dolphy, 257 A.D.2d 681, 685, lv denied 93 N.Y.2d 872; see also, People v. Jones, 286 A.D.2d 785). Our review of the record fails to disclose any extraordinary circumstances warranting a modification of the agreed-upon sentence in the interest of justice. Despite defendant's young age, lack of criminal record and other mitigating factors, the sentence imposed was far less than the maximum for this violent attack arising out of a planned nighttime ambush by defendant and his codefendant using brass knuckles and a baseball bat. The fact that the codefendant may have received a lesser sentence of 7½ years, although convicted of the same crime, does not warrant disturbing County Court's exercise of discretion in this regard (see, People v. King, 277 A.D.2d 708, 712, lv denied 96 N.Y.2d 802; People v. Shahid, 262 A.D.2d 670, 671-672, lv denied 94 N.Y.2d 829).

Cardona, P.J., Mercure, Spain, Mugglin and Rose, JJ., concur.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.


Summaries of

People v. Irizarry

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Dec 27, 2001
289 A.D.2d 875 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
Case details for

People v. Irizarry

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. FELIX IRIZARRY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Dec 27, 2001

Citations

289 A.D.2d 875 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
734 N.Y.S.2d 518

Citing Cases

People v. Thompson

Defendant's extreme emotional disturbance was a mitigating factor already considered by the court in allowing…

People v. Sindoni

Defendant's sole contention on appeal—that the resentence is harsh and excessive—is unpersuasive. Initially,…