From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Ingram

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jul 9, 1999
263 A.D.2d 959 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

July 9, 1999

Appeal from Judgment of Ontario County Court, Harvey, J. — Assault, 2nd Degree.

PRESENT: GREEN, J. P., HAYES, PIGOTT, JR., CALLAHAN AND BALIO, JJ.


Judgment unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed and matter remitted to Ontario County Court for resentencing in accordance with the following Memorandum: By failing to move to withdraw the guilty plea or to vacate the judgment of conviction, defendant failed to preserve for our review her challenge to the sufficiency of the plea allocution ( see, People v. Lopez, 71 N.Y.2d 662, 665). Contrary to the contention of defendant, the plea allocution does not qualify for the rare case exception to the preservation doctrine; her statements did not engender significant doubt with respect to her guilt or otherwise call into question the voluntariness of the plea ( see, People v. Toxey, 86 N.Y.2d 725, 726, rearg denied 86 N.Y.2d 839; People v. Lopez, supra, at 666)

The sentencing minutes indicate that County Court imposed a determinate sentence of two years upon defendant's conviction of attempted assault in the second degree under count two of the indictment. The certificate of conviction, however, indicates that an indeterminate sentence of 1 1/2 to 3 years was imposed upon that conviction. Because of the discrepancy between the sentencing minutes and the certificate of conviction, the sentence imposed on count two must be vacated and the matter remitted to Ontario County Court for resentencing on that count ( see, People v. Mohammed, 151 A.D.2d 1018, 1019, lv denied 74 N.Y.2d 815; People v. Lerner, 122 A.D.2d 813, lv denied 68 N.Y.2d 1001; People v. Stokes, 121 A.D.2d 412, lv denied 68 N.Y.2d 760). We reject defendant's contention that the sentence is otherwise unduly harsh or severe.


Summaries of

People v. Ingram

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jul 9, 1999
263 A.D.2d 959 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

People v. Ingram

Case Details

Full title:PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. MARTHA MAE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Jul 9, 1999

Citations

263 A.D.2d 959 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
695 N.Y.S.2d 453

Citing Cases

People v. Sinkler

There is a discrepancy between the sentencing transcript and the certificate of conviction with respect to…

People v. Shand

The certificate of conviction, however, indicates that an indeterminate sentence of 10 to 20 years was…