From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Hurst

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jun 10, 2005
19 A.D.3d 1165 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)

Opinion

KA 03-01914.

June 10, 2005.

Appeal from an order of the Monroe County Court (Frank P. Geraci, Jr., J.), entered August 5, 2003. The order determined that defendant is a level two risk pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act.

EDWARD J. NOWAK, PUBLIC DEFENDER, ROCHESTER (JAMES ECKERT OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

MICHAEL C. GREEN, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, ROCHESTER (MARGARET A. JONES OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT.

Before: Martoche, J.P., Smith, Lawton and Hayes, JJ.


It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from an order determining that he is a level two risk pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law § 168 et seq.). Because attempted burglary in the second degree is a violent felony offense as a matter of law ( see Penal Law § 70.02 [c]; People v. Wroten, 286 AD2d 189, 198, lv denied 97 NY2d 610), we conclude that County Court's designation of defendant as a level two risk is supported by clear and convincing evidence ( see generally Correction Law § 168-n). Defendant's remaining contention is not preserved for our review ( see Oram v. Capone, 206 AD2d 839, 840) and, in any event, lacks merit.


Summaries of

People v. Hurst

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jun 10, 2005
19 A.D.3d 1165 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
Case details for

People v. Hurst

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JAMES HURST, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Jun 10, 2005

Citations

19 A.D.3d 1165 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
795 N.Y.S.2d 913

Citing Cases

People v. Hurst

Decided September 15, 2005. Appeal from 4th Dept: 19 AD3d 1165. Motion for leave to appeal…

People v. Glenn

Contrary to the defendant's contention, the County Court's determination designating him a level two sex…