Opinion
112215
02-09-2023
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Stanley HUNTERimposing the enhanced sentence and that
Richard L. Herzfeld, New York City, for appellant. Brian P. Conaty, Acting District Attorney, Monticello (Lisa M. Bondarenka of counsel), for respondent.
Richard L. Herzfeld, New York City, for appellant.
Brian P. Conaty, Acting District Attorney, Monticello (Lisa M. Bondarenka of counsel), for respondent.
Before: Garry, P.J., Egan Jr., Lynch, Pritzker and McShan, JJ.
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
Lynch, J. Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Sullivan County (Frank J. LaBuda, J.), rendered October 17, 2019, which denied defendant's motion to withdraw his plea and resentenced him to a term of incarceration.
In 2010, defendant and two codefendants were charged with various crimes following an attempted robbery during which defendant shot and killed the victim. In satisfaction of a nine-count indictment, defendant pleaded guilty to murder in the second degree in exchange for a promised prison term of 20 years to life. Following an Outley hearing, County Court concluded that defendant violated a condition of the plea agreement and imposed a prison sentence of 25 years to life. Defendant appealed, and this Court affirmed the judgment of conviction, finding, among other things, that defendant failed to preserve an objection to the enhanced sentence and did not move to withdraw his plea ( 98 A.D.3d 1189, 1190, 951 N.Y.S.2d 275 [3d Dept. 2012], lv denied 20 N.Y.3d 1012, 960 N.Y.S.2d 355, 984 N.E.2d 330 [2013] ).
In 2018, this Court granted defendant's motion for a writ of error coram nobis to reinstate defendant's direct appeal from the judgment of conviction for the limited purpose of addressing the issue of whether defendant's trial counsel was ineffective for failing to either object to the enhanced sentence or move to withdraw his plea ( 173 A.D.3d 1249, 1249, 102 N.Y.S.3d 339 [3d Dept. 2019], lv denied 34 N.Y.3d 933, 109 N.Y.S.3d 702, 133 N.E.3d 402 [2019] ). This Court found that the record failed to reflect that County Court provided defendant with valid Parker warnings or an opportunity to withdraw his plea before imposing the enhanced sentence and that trial counsel was ineffective for failing to preserve the propriety of the enhanced sentence by objecting or moving to withdraw the plea ( id. at 1252, 102 N.Y.S.3d 339 ). As such, this Court vacated defendant's sentence and remitted the matter to County Court to either impose the agreed-upon sentence or to provide defendant with the option to withdraw his plea ( id. ). Upon remittal to County Court, defendant filed, pursuant to CPL 220.60(3), a motion to withdraw his guilty plea, contending that his plea was not entered into voluntarily, knowingly and intelligently because trial counsel allowed County Court to, prior to the plea agreement, misadvise defendant about his potential sentencing exposure. The People opposed the motion, and, when defendant appeared for resentencing, County Court denied defendant's motion to withdraw his guilty plea and, consistent with the terms of the plea agreement, sentenced defendant to a prison term of 20 years to life. Defendant appeals.
We affirm. In this Court's 2019 decision, we vacated the sentence and remitted the matter to County Court "to either impose the agreed-upon sentence or provide defendant with the option to withdraw his plea" ( 173 A.D.3d at 1252, 102 N.Y.S.3d 339 ). "County Court's adherence to the original plea agreement is not inconsistent with our prior decision[,] and, contrary to defendant's claim, it was not required to afford defendant the opportunity to withdraw his plea" ( People v. Gantt, 77 A.D.3d 988, 989, 908 N.Y.S.2d 747 [3d Dept. 2010] ; see People v. Schwickrath, 40 A.D.3d 1218, 1219, 834 N.Y.S.2d 751 [3d Dept. 2007] ; People v. Toms, 2 A.D.3d 897, 898, 767 N.Y.S.2d 692 [3d Dept. 2003] ; see generally CPL 470.45 ; People v. McConnell, 49 N.Y.2d 340, 348–349, 425 N.Y.S.2d 794, 402 N.E.2d 133 [1980] ). Defendant's remaining arguments involving his claim that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel are not properly before us, as such matters should have been raised on the appeal from the original judgment of conviction and may not be raised on an appeal from resentencing (see People v. Gantt, 77 A.D.3d at 989, 908 N.Y.S.2d 747 ; People v. Ryder, 239 A.D.2d 364, 365, 657 N.Y.S.2d 998 [2d Dept. 1997], lv denied 90 N.Y.2d 910, 663 N.Y.S.2d 522, 686 N.E.2d 234 [1997] ; People v. Cahill, 190 A.D.2d 744, 744–745, 593 N.Y.S.2d 537 [2d Dept. 1993], lv denied 81 N.Y.2d 883, 597 N.Y.S.2d 944, 613 N.E.2d 976 [1993] ; cf. People v. Foster, 42 A.D.2d 801, 801, 346 N.Y.S.2d 362 [3d Dept. 1973] ).
Garry, P.J., Egan Jr., Pritzker and McShan, JJ., concur.
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.