From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Houston

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jan 9, 1969
31 A.D.2d 777 (N.Y. App. Div. 1969)

Opinion

January 9, 1969

Appeal from the Orleans County Court.

Present — Bastow, P.J., Del Vecchio, Marsh, Witmer and Henry, JJ.


Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The record shows that the defendant served copies of his brief upon the District Attorney in ample time for the latter to prepare and file his brief in response thereto for the December Term of this court. The District Attorney submitted no brief, however, and defaulted and the court has been required to consider the appeal without benefit of a brief or argument on behalf of the People. It is the duty of the District Attorney to represent the People on all such appeals from convictions obtained in his county, especially in cases of this seriousness ( People v. Wright, 22 A.D.2d 754). We deplore this apparent lack of interest on the part of the District Attorney.


Summaries of

People v. Houston

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jan 9, 1969
31 A.D.2d 777 (N.Y. App. Div. 1969)
Case details for

People v. Houston

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JOSEPH JUNIOR HOUSTON…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Jan 9, 1969

Citations

31 A.D.2d 777 (N.Y. App. Div. 1969)

Citing Cases

People v. Tifft

We further note that the District Attorney of Jefferson County did not personally appear to oppose the…

People v. Pitsley

Memorandum: In affirming we are constrained to comment again on the failure of a District Attorney to submit…