From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Houppert

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jun 15, 1967
28 A.D.2d 807 (N.Y. App. Div. 1967)

Opinion

June 15, 1967

Appeal from the Lewis County Court.

Present — Williams, P.J., Bastow, Henry, Del Vecchio and Marsh, JJ.


Judgment unanimously reversed and indictment dismissed. Memorandum: An indictment was returned against appellant charging assault, second degree, in that "with intent to prevent and resist his lawful apprehension and detention" he assaulted a Deputy Sheriff. Upon the trial the People offered no proof to sustain this allegation. Instead the evidence was that if an assault was committed it was to prevent the apprehension and detention of a third party. At the close of the People's case defendant moved to dismiss and the prosecution moved to amend the indictment so that it would read that the alleged assault was committed with intent to prevent appellant's apprehension and detention "or that of another." The court denied the defense motion but both the stenographer's minutes and those of the clerk fail to show that the motion of the People was ruled upon. The case was submitted to the jury as if the indictment had been amended. Assuming, however, that the motion had been granted the amendment was completely invalid and bestowed no jurisdiction upon the court. ( People v. Crawford, 27 A.D.2d 312.)


Summaries of

People v. Houppert

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jun 15, 1967
28 A.D.2d 807 (N.Y. App. Div. 1967)
Case details for

People v. Houppert

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. RODNEY HOUPPERT…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Jun 15, 1967

Citations

28 A.D.2d 807 (N.Y. App. Div. 1967)

Citing Cases

People v. Spinelli

The motion to amend was governed by CPL 200.70 (subd. 2) which provides, in pertinent part: "nor may an…

People v. Moy

The jury returned a verdict of guilty as to robbery in the second degree. In view of the fact that no…