From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Holston

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 14, 1993
194 A.D.2d 689 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)

Opinion

June 14, 1993

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Linakis, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is reversed, on the law, and a new trial is ordered. No questions of fact have been raised or considered.

We agree with the defendant's contention that the trial court improvidently discharged a sworn juror without first conducting "a reasonably thorough inquiry and recitation on the record of the facts and reasons for invoking the statutory authorization of discharging and replacing [the] juror based on continued unavailability" (People v. Page, 72 N.Y.2d 69, 73; see, CPL 270.35; see, People v. Davis, 178 A.D.2d 424, 425). Therefore, the defendant's judgment of conviction must be reversed and a new trial ordered (People v. Taylor, 154 A.D.2d 634, 635; affd 76 N.Y.2d 873). Miller, J.P., Ritter, Copertino and Pizzuto, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Holston

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 14, 1993
194 A.D.2d 689 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
Case details for

People v. Holston

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. RANDY HOLSTON, Also…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 14, 1993

Citations

194 A.D.2d 689 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
599 N.Y.S.2d 1005

Citing Cases

People v. Engstrom

In determining whether discharge of a juror is warranted based on illness, incapacity, or unavailability, the…