From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Holmes

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jul 12, 1985
112 A.D.2d 739 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)

Opinion

July 12, 1985

Appeal from the Monroe County Court, Cornelius, J.

Present — Callahan, J.P., Boomer, Green, Pine and Schnepp, JJ.


Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Proof of defendant's conviction of a subsequent unrelated charge of criminal possession of a forged instrument was admissible to prove defendant's knowledge of the forgery in the instant case ( People v. Molineux, 168 N.Y. 264, 297-298; see also, People v Schwartzman, 24 N.Y.2d 241; People v. Dales, 309 N.Y. 97, 101).

We have examined defendant's other claim of error and find it without merit.


Summaries of

People v. Holmes

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jul 12, 1985
112 A.D.2d 739 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)
Case details for

People v. Holmes

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. MONA LISA HOLMES…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Jul 12, 1985

Citations

112 A.D.2d 739 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)

Citing Cases

People v. Ingram

Most often, of course, defendant's intent or state of mind is established by proving prior similar crimes.…

People v. Frumusa

The contempt order and related testimony involved defendant's conduct, through his businesses, that occurred…