From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Holman

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Apr 30, 1992
594 N.E.2d 928 (N.Y. 1992)

Opinion

Argued March 26, 1992

Decided April 30, 1992

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department, James Leff, J.

Sharon D. Gray for appellant.

Robert M. Morgenthau, District Attorney (Gregory H. Mansfield and Norman Barclay of counsel), for respondent.


Order affirmed. The record establishes that, in considering defendant's Sandoval motion, the Trial Judge balanced the probative worth of the evidence against the risk of unfair prejudice to the defendant in accordance with People v Sandoval ( 34 N.Y.2d 371).

Concur: Chief Judge WACHTLER and Judges KAYE, TITONE, HANCOCK, JR., BELLACOSA and YESAWICH, JR. Taking no part: Judge SIMONS.

Designated pursuant to N Y Constitution, article VI, § 2.


Summaries of

People v. Holman

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Apr 30, 1992
594 N.E.2d 928 (N.Y. 1992)
Case details for

People v. Holman

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. EUGENE HOLMAN…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Apr 30, 1992

Citations

594 N.E.2d 928 (N.Y. 1992)
594 N.E.2d 928
584 N.Y.S.2d 434

Citing Cases

People v. Wiggins

The testimony of the Assistant District Attorney and the fact that the outburst was not transcribed support…

People v. Chandler

, People v. Lincoln, 80 A.D.2d 877; see also, People v. Ferrara, 99 A.D.2d 257, 259-260). Supreme Court's…