From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Hodge

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Apr 19, 1996
226 A.D.2d 1124 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

Opinion

April 19, 1996

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Erie County, Wolfgang, J.

Present — Green, J.P., Fallon, Wesley, Davis and Boehm, JJ.


Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Supreme Court did not abuse its discretion in denying, without a hearing, the motion of defendant to withdraw his guilty plea prior to sentencing ( see, CPL 220.60; People v. Tinsley, 35 N.Y.2d 926, 927; People v. Boothman, 217 A.D.2d 1007). The contention that trial counsel failed to advise defendant that his sentence would run concurrently with a sentence he was serving on a prior conviction is based upon matters outside the record. Therefore, defendant is relegated to a motion for postjudgment relief ( see, CPL 440.10; People v. Larrabee, 201 A.D.2d 924, lv denied 83 N.Y.2d 855; see also, People v. Ramos, 63 N.Y.2d 640). Finally, from our review of the record, we conclude that defendant voluntarily, knowingly and intelligently waived his right to appeal ( see, People v. Moissett, 76 N.Y.2d 909; People v Underwood, 210 A.D.2d 994).


Summaries of

People v. Hodge

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Apr 19, 1996
226 A.D.2d 1124 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
Case details for

People v. Hodge

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. EDWARD HODGE, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Apr 19, 1996

Citations

226 A.D.2d 1124 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
642 N.Y.S.2d 832

Citing Cases

PEOPLE v. MAYE

hat he had a full and complete opportunity to speak to counsel and was satisfied with his counsel's legal…

People v. Gilchrist

, People v. Burton, 251 A.D.2d 1020 [decided herewith]). To the extent that the contention that defense…