From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Hizbullah

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 19, 2000
273 A.D.2d 409 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

Submitted May 1, 2000.

June 19, 2000.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County (Cotter, J.), rendered September 22, 1998, convicting him of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree (two counts), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Sally Wasserman, Westbury, N.Y., for appellant.

Denis Dillon, District Attorney, Mineola, N.Y. (Peter A. Weinstein and Andrea M. DiGregorio of counsel), for respondent.

Before: FRED T. SANTUCCI, J.P., WILLIAM C. THOMPSON, WILLIAM D. FRIEDMANN, GABRIEL M. KRAUSMAN, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's constitutional right to be present during a material stage of trial (see, People v. Monroe, 90 N.Y.2d 982) was not violated by his exclusion from sidebar conferences during jury selection (see, People v. Velasco, 77 N.Y.2d 469). The defendant was in the courtroom throughout jury selection, the challenges to prospective jurors were exercised and recorded in open court, and the defendant had an opportunity to consult with his attorney before the challenges were made (see, People v. Velasco, supra).

The defendant also was properly excluded from two sidebar discussions during the trial, as both discussions involved purely legal or procedural matters about which the defendant had no special knowledge (see, People v. Rodriguez, 85 N.Y.2d 586; People v. Velasco, supra).


Summaries of

People v. Hizbullah

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 19, 2000
273 A.D.2d 409 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

People v. Hizbullah

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE, ETC., RESPONDENT, v. RUHULLAH HIZBULLAH, APPELLANT. (IND. NO…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 19, 2000

Citations

273 A.D.2d 409 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
711 N.Y.S.2d 328

Citing Cases

People v. Davis

an ex parte protective order ( see 240.50 [1]); however, neither the order nor the supporting papers are…

People v. Collier

Further, we are satisfied that the defendant received the effective assistance of counsel ( see People v.…