Opinion
May 13, 1991
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Sherman, J.).
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant's contention that reversal of his conviction is required because the trial court failed to impose a sanction for the People's violation of People v Rosario ( 9 N.Y.2d 286) is unpreserved for this court's review, as the defendant neither objected thereto nor requested sanctions as a remedy (see, CPL 470.05; People v Best, 145 A.D.2d 499; see also, People v Mathews, 173 A.D.2d 565 [decided herewith]).
We have considered the defendant's remaining contention and find it to be without merit. Thompson, J.P., Brown, Eiber and O'Brien, JJ., concur.