From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Hightower

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
May 7, 1999
261 A.D.2d 871 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

May 7, 1999

Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Erie County, Burns, J. — Criminal Possession Weapon, 3rd Degree.

Present — Lawton, J. P., Hayes, Wisner, Pigott, Jr., and Callahan, JJ.


Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly denied defendant's suppression motion. While responding to a report of shots fired at about 5:30 A.M. in the Reed Street vicinity, a high crime area, two Buffalo police officers observed defendant and another male running north on Reed Street. Defendant handed an object to a third male also headed north on Reed Street, who put the object in his left pocket. The report of shots fired coupled with the observations of the officers provided them with a founded suspicion that criminal activity was afoot sufficient to approach and make inquiry ( see, People v. Hollman, 79 N.Y.2d 181, 184-185). Because the report concerned shots fired, the officers were entitled to stop and frisk defendant for their personal safety ( see, People v. Brooks, 65 N.Y.2d 1021, 1023). When the other officer asked the third male what defendant had handed him, he replied that it was a gun, and removed a gun from his left pocket. At that point, there was probable cause to arrest defendant. The sentence is neither unduly harsh nor severe.


Summaries of

People v. Hightower

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
May 7, 1999
261 A.D.2d 871 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

People v. Hightower

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. ISAAC HIGHTOWER…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: May 7, 1999

Citations

261 A.D.2d 871 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
699 N.Y.S.2d 847

Citing Cases

People v. Russ

The police officers lawfully stopped the minivan driven by defendant based upon a reasonable suspicion of…

People v. Binet

We additionally conclude that defendant's statement to the officer that he had a handgun in his pocket…