From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Higdon

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 25, 1995
214 A.D.2d 488 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

April 25, 1995

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Bronx County (Frank Diaz, J.).


The imposition of consecutive sentences was not violative of Penal Law § 70.25 (2), defendant having pleaded to two distinct and separate crimes, involving different acts, that do not contain common material elements (People v Brown, 80 N.Y.2d 361, 363-364). Nor was the sentence excessive, in view of the coldblooded slaying of an innocent bystander.

Concur — Sullivan, J.P., Rosenberger, Wallach, Kupferman and Tom, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Higdon

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 25, 1995
214 A.D.2d 488 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

People v. Higdon

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. CORNELIUS HIGDON…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Apr 25, 1995

Citations

214 A.D.2d 488 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
625 N.Y.S.2d 224

Citing Cases

PEOPLE v. LUGO

Review of this issue is not precluded by the defendant's waiver of his right to appeal ( see, People v…