From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Herrar

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 12, 1986
120 A.D.2d 614 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)

Opinion

May 12, 1986

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Hayes, J.).


Judgment affirmed.

The police had a reasonable basis for stopping the defendant's motorcycle since they had just observed him committing two traffic violations (see, People v Gooden, 111 A.D.2d 871). Upon approaching the defendant, two police officers observed him reaching toward his bulging jacket pocket. The officers were thus presented with a reasonable suspicion of danger so as to warrant the minimal intrusion of a frisk of the defendant (see, People v Benjamin, 51 N.Y.2d 267). The subsequent seizure of the defendant's gun was, therefore, proper.

Additionally, the defendant had previously been sentenced, on separate occasions, for two predicate violent felonies (see, Penal Law § 70.02). Therefore, even though he had never been sentenced as a second violent felony offender (see, Penal Law § 70.04), he was properly sentenced as a persistent violent felony offender (see, Penal Law § 70.08; People v Morse, 62 N.Y.2d 205). Lazer, J.P., Bracken, Brown and Lawrence, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Herrar

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 12, 1986
120 A.D.2d 614 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)
Case details for

People v. Herrar

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. DANIEL HERRAR…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 12, 1986

Citations

120 A.D.2d 614 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)

Citing Cases

People v. Solomon

The record establishes that the defendant has two prior judgments of conviction for criminal possession of a…

People v. Perez

The description provided by a citizen who asserted that someone attempted to steal his bag, in conjunction…