From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Hernandez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Sep 20, 1999
264 A.D.2d 783 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

Argued October 14, 1997

September 20, 1999

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County (Palmieri, J.), rendered April 1, 1996, convicting him of attempted rape in the first degree and sexual abuse in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. By decision and order dated May 11, 1998, this court affirmed the judgment ( People v. Hernandez, 250 A.D.2d 704). By opinion and order dated May 6, 1999, the Court of Appeals modified the decision and order of this court and remitted the matter to this court for consideration of the defendant's constitutional challenge to his certification as a sex offender pursuant to Correction Law § 168-d(1) and, as so modified, affirmed the decision and order of this court ( People v. Hernandez, 93 N.Y.2d 261).

Matthew Muraskin, Hempstead, N.Y. (Kent V. Moston and Judah Serfaty of counsel), for appellant.

Denis Dillon, District Attorney, Mineola, N.Y. (Bruce E. Whitney and Robert A. Schwartz of counsel), for respondent.

FRED T. SANTUCCI, J.P., THOMAS R. SULLIVAN, GLORIA GOLDSTEIN, DANIEL F. LUCIANO, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant contends that his certification as a sex offender by the sentencing court pursuant to Correction Law § 168-d(1) violated the constitutional prohibition against ex post facto laws, since he committed the subject offenses on or about February 13, 1995, and New York's Sex Offender Registration Act (hereinafter SORA) ( see, Correction Law § 168 et seq.) did not take effect until January 21, 1996. The contention is unpersuasive. This court and a number of other courts have already upheld the constitutionality of the retroactive application of the provisions of SORA to individuals convicted of sex offenses before its effective date in the face of ex post facto challenges ( see, Doe v. Pataki, 120 F.3d 1263, cert denied 522 U.S. 1122; People v. Langdon, 258 A.D.2d 937 [4th Dept., Feb. 10, 1999]; People v. Grice, 254 A.D.2d 710 [4th Dept., Oct. 2, 1998]; Matter of S. V. v. Calabrese, 246 A.D.2d 655; Matter of M. G. v. Travis, 236 A.D.2d 163).

SANTUCCI, J.P., SULLIVAN, GOLDSTEIN, and LUCIANO, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Hernandez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Sep 20, 1999
264 A.D.2d 783 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

People v. Hernandez

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. JOSE O. HERNANDEZ, appellant. (Ind. No…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Sep 20, 1999

Citations

264 A.D.2d 783 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
695 N.Y.S.2d 126

Citing Cases

People v. Williams

The defendant appeals. Contrary to the defendant's contention, he has not shown that the restrictions imposed…

People v. McFarland

The same conclusion has been reached by multiple New York appellate courts. See e.g., People v. Hernandez,…