From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Heidgen

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Sep 13, 2011
87 A.D.3d 1035 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)

Opinion

2011-09-13

The PEOPLE, etc., respondent,v.Martin HEIDGEN, appellant.


Marianne Karas, Armonk, N.Y., for appellant.Kathleen M. Rice, District Attorney, Mineola, N.Y. (Tammy J. Smiley and Judith R. Sternberg of counsel), for respondent.

*501 Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County (Jaeger, J.), rendered March 19, 2008, convicting him of tampering with physical evidence, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant's contention, he failed to preserve for appellate review his claim that his Alford plea ( see North Carolina v. Alford, 400 U.S. 25, 91 S.Ct. 160, 27 L.Ed.2d 162) was invalid because it was involuntary and because the record did not contain sufficient proof of guilt, insofar as the defendant did not move to withdraw the plea ( People v. Bunn, 79 A.D.3d 1143, 914 N.Y.S.2d 907; People v. Harris, 79 A.D.3d 1069, 912 N.Y.S.2d 698; People v. Higgs, 266 A.D.2d 233, 696 N.Y.S.2d 902). In any event, the plea was voluntary, inasmuch as the County Court ensured that the defendant discussed the plea with his counsel, understood the ramifications of pleading guilty, and entered the plea for acceptable reasons ( see People v. Washington, 51 A.D.3d 1223, 1224, 858 N.Y.S.2d 434; People v. Cash, 19 A.D.3d 934, 935, 797 N.Y.S.2d 628). Moreover, the County Court's review of the grand jury minutes prior to the defendant's plea established a basis in the record for finding strong circumstantial evidence of the defendant's guilt ( see People v. Rock, 56 A.D.3d 1053, 868 N.Y.S.2d 358; People v. Washington, 51 A.D.3d at 1224, 858 N.Y.S.2d 434).

SKELOS, J.P., DICKERSON, AUSTIN and COHEN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Heidgen

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Sep 13, 2011
87 A.D.3d 1035 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)
Case details for

People v. Heidgen

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE, etc., respondent,v.Martin HEIDGEN, appellant.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Sep 13, 2011

Citations

87 A.D.3d 1035 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)
2011 N.Y. Slip Op. 6495
929 N.Y.S.2d 500