From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Headley

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 10, 2001
289 A.D.2d 341 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

Opinion

Nos. 1999-09435 2000-09340

Submitted November 7, 2001.

December 10, 2001.

Appeals by the defendant from two judgments of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Ambrosio, J.), both rendered January 24, 2000, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the fifth degree under Indictment No. 3352/98, and criminal sale of a controlled substance in the fifth degree under Indictment No. 2591/99, upon his pleas of guilty, and imposing sentences.

ANDREW C. FINE, New York, N.Y. (BONNIE B. GOLDBURG of counsel), for appellant.

CHARLES J. HYNES, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (LEONARD JOBLOVE and CYNTHIA KEAN of counsel; KARIN MCINERNEY on the brief), for respondent.

Before: FRED T. SANTUCCI, J.P., MYRIAM J. ALTMAN, ANITA R. FLORIO, HOWARD MILLER, BARRY A. COZIER, JJ.


ORDERED that the judgments are affirmed.

The defendant's valid and unrestricted waiver of his right to appeal forecloses appellate review of his claim that his sentences are excessive (see, People v. Hidalgo, 91 N.Y.2d 733, 735).

SANTUCCI, J.P., ALTMAN, FLORIO, H. MILLER and COZIER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Headley

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 10, 2001
289 A.D.2d 341 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
Case details for

People v. Headley

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE, ETC., Respondent, v. JUAN HEADLEY, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 10, 2001

Citations

289 A.D.2d 341 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
734 N.Y.S.2d 491

Citing Cases

People v. Scott

Therefore, her claim that her plea was not intelligently, voluntarily, and knowingly made is unpreserved for…

People v. Mitchell

The defendant never sought to withdraw his plea of guilty before he was sentenced so as to preserve his claim…