From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Haynes

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Aug 1, 2006
32 A.D.3d 400 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)

Opinion

2003-04631.

August 1, 2006.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Dowling, J.), rendered May 6, 2003, convicting him of robbery in the first degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing, of that branch of the defendant's omnibus motion which was to suppress physical evidence.

Steven Banks, New York, N.Y. (William B. Carney of counsel), for appellant.

Charles J. Hynes, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove, Sholom J. Twersky, Benjamin Mintz, and Steven R. Wirth of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Florio, J.P, Crane, Ritter and Fisher, JJ.


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant's contention, he was not denied the effective assistance of counsel. Viewing the record as a whole, the defendant received meaningful representation ( see People v Baldi, 54 NY2d 137).

Further, the hearing court properly denied that branch of the defendant's omnibus motion which was to suppress certain physical evidence for the reasons stated on the codefendant's appeal ( see People v Haynes, 16 AD3d 434).


Summaries of

People v. Haynes

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Aug 1, 2006
32 A.D.3d 400 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
Case details for

People v. Haynes

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. THOMAS HAYNES…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Aug 1, 2006

Citations

32 A.D.3d 400 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
2006 N.Y. Slip Op. 6086
820 N.Y.S.2d 299

Citing Cases

Haynes v. Ercole

The Appellate Division rejected Petitioner's claims and affirmed his conviction. People v. Haynes, 820…