From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Harrison

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 29, 1998
251 A.D.2d 681 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

June 29, 1998

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Cooperman, J.).


Ordered that the judgment rendered December 12, 1996, and the judgment rendered December 12, 1996, as amended, are affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant's contention, the statement he made to a detective while he was being transported to the precinct before he was advised of his Miranda rights was spontaneous and not a result of improper police interrogation. There was no reason for the detective to suspect that by answering the defendant's question as to why he was arrested, the defendant would give a response incriminating himself ( see, People v. Lynes, 49 N.Y.2d 286, 295; People v. Webb, 224 A.D.2d 464; People v. Hylton, 198 A.D.2d 301).

Also unavailing is the defendant's contention that a juror should have been discharged as grossly unqualified because she had contact with a grand juror who was possibly familiar with the defendant's case. The juror unequivocably stated that she did not accept the grand juror's statements as fact and that his statements did not affect her ability to be fair and impartial. Further, as noted by the Supreme Court, the juror did not communicate the grand juror's statements to the other jurors and she did not have greater knowledge about the case than she had prior to her contact with the grand juror. The facts in this case do not meet the "grossly unqualified" standard as set forth in CPL 270.35 ( see, People v. Buford, 69 N.Y.2d 290, 299-300; People v. Rosario, 241 A.D.2d 502; People v. Taveras, 224 A.D.2d 461, 462).

The defendant's remaining contentions regarding his conviction under Indictment No. 354/96 are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant's assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal from the judgment under Indictment No. 171/96. Counsel's application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted ( see, Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738; People v. Paige, 54 A.D.2d 631; cf., People v. Gonzalez, 47 N.Y.2d 606).

Sullivan, J. P., Pizzuto, Altman and Friedmann, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Harrison

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 29, 1998
251 A.D.2d 681 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

People v. Harrison

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. RONALD HARRISON, Also…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 29, 1998

Citations

251 A.D.2d 681 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
677 N.Y.S.2d 794

Citing Cases

People v. Velasquez

See, People v. Rivers, supra, 56 NY2d at 479; People v. Vartholomeou, 21 Misc 3d 134A (App. Term, 9th 10th…

People v. Vartholomeou (Katherine)

Further, "not every comment made by a police officer in response to an inquiry by the defendant can be said…