Opinion
October 20, 1986
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Pitaro, J.).
Ordered that the judgments are affirmed.
The claims of error based on the prosecutor's comments during summation were largely unpreserved for appellate review as a matter of law (see, People v Arce, 42 N.Y.2d 179, 190; People v Medina, 53 N.Y.2d 951, 953), and those errors that were preserved did not deprive the defendant of a fair trial (see, People v Galloway, 54 N.Y.2d 396, 399; People v Jalah, 107 A.D.2d 762). Furthermore, there is no reason to disturb the defendant's sentences (see, People v Farrar, 52 N.Y.2d 302, 305; People v Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80, 86). Mollen, P.J., Thompson, Eiber and Spatt, JJ., concur.