From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Harrison

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 8, 1986
120 A.D.2d 358 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)

Opinion

May 8, 1986

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Arnold Fraiman, J.).


Defendant was charged with all of the counts as to which the jury found him guilty, except that prior to submission to the jury, two assault in the first degree counts were reduced to assault in the third degree and a count of reckless endangerment in the first degree was dismissed.

The charges and indictment stemmed from an April 30, 1983 incident in which a vehicle driven by defendant crashed through a display window of a clothing store on West 34th Street in Manhattan, killing a young woman and injuring 17 others.

We have no intention of minimizing the seriousness of defendant's crime or its impact upon the family of the decedent. However, in view of the nature and circumstances of the crime and the consistent remorse expressed by defendant for the tragic consequences of the crash, we have concluded that the sentence was excessive to the extent indicated.

We have examined the other claims of error advanced on defendant's behalf, and find them to be without merit.

Concur — Murphy, P.J., Sandler, Fein, Kassal and Ellerin, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Harrison

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 8, 1986
120 A.D.2d 358 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)
Case details for

People v. Harrison

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JAMES HARRISON…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: May 8, 1986

Citations

120 A.D.2d 358 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)

Citing Cases

People v. Walsh

ly life. His decline, marked by business failure, family dissolution and larceny, has been fueled by drug and…

People v. Paulino

stice (see People v Fernandez, 84 A.D.3d 661, 664 [1st Dept 2011] ["in deciding what sentence is appropriate,…