From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Harris

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Oct 1, 1993
197 A.D.2d 930 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)

Opinion

October 1, 1993

Appeal from the Onondaga County Court, Mulroy, J.

Present — Pine, J.P., Fallon, Boomer, Davis and Boehm, JJ.


Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: County Court did not abuse its discretion in imposing an enhanced sentence inasmuch as defendant breached the no-arrest condition of his postplea release (see, People v. Outley, 80 N.Y.2d 702). The record establishes that the court had no duty to inquire into the propriety of defendant's postplea arrests because defendant neither raised an issue "concerning the validity of the postplea charge" nor denied "any involvement in the underlying crime" (People v. Outley, supra, at 713).


Summaries of

People v. Harris

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Oct 1, 1993
197 A.D.2d 930 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
Case details for

People v. Harris

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. ROBERT W. HARRIS…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Oct 1, 1993

Citations

197 A.D.2d 930 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
604 N.Y.S.2d 849

Citing Cases

People v. Nowlin

In appeal No. 1, defendant contends in his pro se supplemental brief that the court erred in failing to…

People v. Nowlin

In appeal No. 1, defendant contends in his pro se supplemental brief that the court erred in failing to…