From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Harris

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 12, 1994
203 A.D.2d 98 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

April 12, 1994

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Michael Carriero, J.).


Defendant broke into the victim's apartment, and stole cash and a tape deck, which he placed in a shopping bag. Police responded moments later. Defendant, who was dressed as described by the victim, and a companion were apprehended a couple of blocks away about 20 minutes later, carrying a shopping bag. The shopping bag contained a tape deck. Defendant was brought back to the victim's apartment moments later for a confirmatory showup. Under the circumstances, there is no reason to conclude that the showup was inappropriately conducted (see, People v Duuvon, 77 N.Y.2d 541). Defendant was apprehended in close proximity of time and location to the crime (see, People v King, 159 A.D.2d 306, lv denied 76 N.Y.2d 738).

Defendant's contention that since the police had probable cause to arrest him for possession of stolen property, they should have conducted a lineup, rather than a showup, is without merit (see, People v Torres, 169 A.D.2d 584, lv denied 77 N.Y.2d 911; People v Ruiz, 190 A.D.2d 572).

We have considered defendant's remaining contentions and find them to be without merit.

Concur — Sullivan, J.P., Asch, Nardelli and Tom, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Harris

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 12, 1994
203 A.D.2d 98 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

People v. Harris

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. REGINALD HARRIS…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Apr 12, 1994

Citations

203 A.D.2d 98 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
610 N.Y.S.2d 216

Citing Cases

People v. Vega

The defendant's contention that the circumstances did not justify the use of a showup identification…