From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Harris

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Feb 4, 2005
15 A.D.3d 848 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)

Opinion

KA 04-00515.

February 4, 2005.

Appeal from a judgment of the Seneca County Court (Dennis F. Bender, J.), rendered October 28, 2003. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of promoting prison contraband in the first degree.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed.

Present: Green, J.P., Hurlbutt, Scudder, Lawton and Hayes, JJ.


Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of promoting prison contraband in the first degree (Penal Law § 205.25). Contrary to the contention of defendant, the record establishes that he knowingly, intelligently and voluntarily waived his right to appeal ( see People v. Willis, 2 AD3d 1322, 1322-1323, lv denied 2 NY3d 748). That waiver encompasses the further contention of defendant with respect to the denial of his motion to dismiss the indictment on the ground that he was denied his right to testify before the grand jury ( see People v. Beaton, 303 AD2d 593, 594, lv denied 100 NY2d 578). In any event, by pleading guilty, defendant forfeited his right to review of that contention on appeal ( see People v. Rook, 201 AD2d 931).


Summaries of

People v. Harris

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Feb 4, 2005
15 A.D.3d 848 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
Case details for

People v. Harris

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. THORNELL HARRIS…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Feb 4, 2005

Citations

15 A.D.3d 848 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
788 N.Y.S.2d 765

Citing Cases

People v. M&M Med. Transp., Inc.

ion is encompassed by the valid waiver of its right to appeal (see People v. McCrea, 140 A.D.3d 1655, 1655,…

People v. M & M Med. Transp., Inc.

We conclude that defendant's challenge to the factual sufficiency of its plea allocution is encompassed by…