From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Harris

Court of Appeals of New York.
Nov 27, 2012
2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 8058 (N.Y. 2012)

Opinion

2012-11-27

The PEOPLE, etc., Appellant, v. James A. HARRIS, Jr., Respondent.

Francis D. Phillips, II, District Attorney, Middletown (Andrew R. Kass of counsel), for appellant. Warren S. Hecht, Forest Hills, for respondent.


Francis D. Phillips, II, District Attorney, Middletown (Andrew R. Kass of counsel), for appellant. Warren S. Hecht, Forest Hills, for respondent.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order affirmed. There is support in the record for the Appellate Division's determination that defendant unequivocally invoked his right to counsel while in custody, and that mixed question of law and fact is beyond our further review. We agree with the Appellate Division that the hearing court's error in failing to suppress defendant's statements was not harmless beyond a reasonable doubt and that defendant is entitled to a new trial.

Chief Judge LIPPMAN and Judges CIPARICK, GRAFFEO, READ, SMITH and PIGOTT concur.


Summaries of

People v. Harris

Court of Appeals of New York.
Nov 27, 2012
2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 8058 (N.Y. 2012)
Case details for

People v. Harris

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE, etc., Appellant, v. James A. HARRIS, Jr., Respondent.

Court:Court of Appeals of New York.

Date published: Nov 27, 2012

Citations

2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 8058 (N.Y. 2012)
956 N.Y.S.2d 478
980 N.E.2d 527
2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 8058

Citing Cases

People v. Harris

I completely understand what you're saying and I agree with you, but I don't want to f* *k myself." In our…

People v. Dawson

We have found statements to police to be unequivocal even when suspects have used conditional language or…