From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Harris

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Aug 17, 2017
153 A.D.3d 1092 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)

Opinion

08-17-2017

The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Taiwan HARRIS, Appellant.

Eric K. Schillinger, East Greenbush, for appellant. Robert M. Carney, District Attorney, Schenectady (Chandler Delameter of counsel), for respondent.


Eric K. Schillinger, East Greenbush, for appellant.

Robert M. Carney, District Attorney, Schenectady (Chandler Delameter of counsel), for respondent.

Before: GARRY, J.P., EGAN JR., LYNCH, MULVEY and AARONS, JJ.

EGAN JR., J.Appeal from an order of the County Court of Schenectady County (Tomlinson, J.), entered August 15, 2014, which denied defendant's motion for resentencing pursuant to the Drug Law Reform Act of 2005.

In 1996, defendant was convicted of, among other things, criminal possession of a controlled substance in the second degree, a class A–II felony, and he was sentenced to 3 ½ years to life in prison. In 2000, he was released to parole supervision. Shortly thereafter, he was arrested and charged with robbery in the first degree. Defendant pleaded guilty to this crime, his parole was revoked and he was sentenced to 10 years in prison. In November 2013, he moved pursuant to the Drug Law Reform Act of 2005 (L 2005, ch 643 [hereinafter the 2005 DLRA] ) to be resentenced on his A–II felony conviction. County Court found that defendant was ineligible for resentencing and denied the motion. Defendant now appeals.We affirm. In People v. Mills, 11 N.Y.3d 527, 872 N.Y.S.2d 705, 901 N.E.2d 196 (2008), the Court of Appeals made it clear that "in order to qualify for resentencing under the 2005 DLRA, class A–II felony drug offenders must not be eligible for parole within three years of their resentencing applications" ( id. at 534, 872 N.Y.S.2d 705, 901 N.E.2d 196 ; see People v. Salvatierra, 51 A.D.3d 1218, 1219, 859 N.Y.S.2d 752 [2008], lv. dismissed 10 N.Y.3d 964, 863 N.Y.S.2d 148, 893 N.E.2d 454 [2008] ). The Court further held that "once a defendant has been released to parole supervision for a class A–II drug felony conviction, he or she no longer qualifies for 2005 DRLA relief for that particular conviction" ( People v. Mills, 11 N.Y.3d at 537, 872 N.Y.S.2d 705, 901 N.E.2d 196 ; see People v. Cavallaro, 46 A.D.3d 1024, 1024, 846 N.Y.S.2d 823 [2007], lv. dismissed 10 N.Y.3d 762, 854 N.Y.S.2d 324, 883 N.E.2d 1259 [2008] ). Here, defendant was released to parole following his A–II felony conviction and was reincarcerated after he committed another crime while on parole. In addition, the record discloses that defendant's eligibility for parole release was to be considered again within three years of his motion for resentencing. Both defendant's prior parole release and upcoming parole reappearance rendered him ineligible for resentencing. Therefore, County Court properly denied his motion.

ORDERED that the order is affirmed.

GARRY, J.P., LYNCH, MULVEY and AARONS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Harris

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Aug 17, 2017
153 A.D.3d 1092 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)
Case details for

People v. Harris

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Taiwan HARRIS…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.

Date published: Aug 17, 2017

Citations

153 A.D.3d 1092 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)
57 N.Y.S.3d 912
2017 N.Y. Slip Op. 6219

Citing Cases

People v. Forsythe

County Court denied the motion, noting that defendant had been released to parole supervision in May 2015…