From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Harris

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Nov 9, 2011
89 A.D.3d 863 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)

Opinion

2011-11-9

The PEOPLE, etc., respondent,v.Dwayne HARRIS, appellant.


Lynn W.L. Fahey, New York, N.Y. (Ellen Fried of counsel), for appellant.Charles J. Hynes, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove and Jodi L. Mandel of counsel; Benjamin Barczewski on the brief), for respondent.

Appeal by the defendant from a resentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Dowling, J.), imposed September 20, 2010, which, upon his conviction of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, imposed a period of postrelease supervision in addition to the determinate term of imprisonment previously imposed on August 20, 2001.

ORDERED that the resentence is affirmed.

Since the defendant had not yet completed his originally imposed sentence of imprisonment when he was resentenced, the resentencing to a term including the statutorily required period of postrelease supervision did not subject him to double jeopardy or violate his right to due process of law ( see People v. Lingle, 16 N.Y.3d 621, 926 N.Y.S.2d 4, 949 N.E.2d 952; People v. Dawkins, 87 A.D.3d 550, 927 N.Y.S.2d 797; People v. Harris, 86 A.D.3d 543, 926 N.Y.S.2d 319, lv. denied 17 N.Y.3d 859, 932 N.Y.S.2d 24, 956 N.E.2d 805; People v. Adams, 85 A.D.3d 1192, 925 N.Y.S.2d 901, lv. denied 17 N.Y.3d 857, 932 N.Y.S.2d 22, 956 N.E.2d 803; People v. Guillen, 85 A.D.3d 1201, 926 N.Y.S.2d 297, lv. denied 17 N.Y.3d 859, 932 N.Y.S.2d 24, 956 N.E.2d 805; People v. Lopez, 85 A.D.3d 1059, 925 N.Y.S.2d 868).

SKELOS, J.P., BALKIN, LEVENTHAL and LOTT, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Harris

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Nov 9, 2011
89 A.D.3d 863 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)
Case details for

People v. Harris

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE, etc., respondent,v.Dwayne HARRIS, appellant.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Nov 9, 2011

Citations

89 A.D.3d 863 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)
2011 N.Y. Slip Op. 8166
932 N.Y.S.2d 357

Citing Cases

People v. Williams

ORDERED that the order is reversed, on the law, and the motion is denied. Since the defendant had not yet…

People v. Warren

ORDERED that the order is reversed, on the law, and the motion is denied. Since the defendant had not yet…