From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Harris

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 1, 1985
110 A.D.2d 660 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)

Opinion

April 1, 1985

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Egitto, J.).


Judgment affirmed.

The record offers no support for defendant's arguments that his Wade and Sandoval motions were improperly denied. Nor does the record provide any support for his argument that his conviction was contrary to the weight of the evidence. Defendant's contention that Penal Law § 70.06 is facially unconstitutional has not been preserved for appellate review and is, in any event, meritless ( People v. Lemon, 62 N.Y.2d 745). The sentence imposed was not excessive. Titone, J.P., Lazer, Niehoff and Rubin, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Harris

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 1, 1985
110 A.D.2d 660 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)
Case details for

People v. Harris

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. ALBERT HARRIS…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 1, 1985

Citations

110 A.D.2d 660 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)

Citing Cases

People v. Wolmart

Ordered that the resentence is affirmed. By failing to raise an objection to his adjudication as a second…

People v. Padilla

The issues raised concerning the prosecutor's summation are not preserved (People v Wright, 172 A.D.2d 293,…