From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Harrell

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 8, 2004
5 A.D.3d 503 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)

Opinion

2001-00406.

Decided March 8, 2004.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (J. Goldberg, J.), rendered October 30, 2000, convicting him of murder in the first degree, robbery in the first degree, attempted robbery in the first degree, robbery in the second degree, attempted robbery in the second degree, criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, and criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, after a nonjury trial, and imposing sentence.

Charles J. Hynes, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove, Rhea A. Grob, and Monique Ferrell of counsel), for respondent.

Laura R. Johnson, New York, N.Y. (Robert Budner of counsel), for appellant.

Before: A. GAIL PRUDENTI, P.J., MYRIAM J. ALTMAN, DANIEL F. LUCIANO, THOMAS A. ADAMS, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's contention that the evidence was legally insufficient to support his conviction of murder in the first degree because the People failed to prove that he caused the victim's death is unpreserved for appellate review inasmuch as he did not specifically raise this issue on his motion to dismiss ( see CPL 470.05; People v. Gray, 86 N.Y.2d 10, 19; People v. Bedford, 296 A.D.2d 553; People v. Ruiz, 211 A.D.2d 829). In any event, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution ( see People v. Contes, 60 N.Y.2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant's guilt of murder in the first degree beyond a reasonable doubt ( see Penal Law § 125.27[a][vii]). There was sufficient evidence from which a rational trier of fact could have found that the defendant, with the intent to kill, shot the victim once, causing a wound which contributed to his death, during the course of, and in furtherance of, a robbery ( see People v. Cicchetti, 44 N.Y.2d 803; People v. Bracey, 41 N.Y.2d 296, 303). Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence ( see CPL 470.15).

PRUDENTI, P.J., ALTMAN, LUCIANO and ADAMS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Harrell

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 8, 2004
5 A.D.3d 503 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
Case details for

People v. Harrell

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE, ETC., Respondent, v. TIMOTHY HARRELL, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 8, 2004

Citations

5 A.D.3d 503 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
772 N.Y.S.2d 581

Citing Cases

People v. Libardi

The defendant's contention that the evidence was legally insufficient to establish his guilt beyond a…

People v. Antwon

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon a jury verdict of murder in the first…