From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Hardeen

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Sep 18, 2000
275 A.D.2d 750 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

Submitted June 2, 2000.

September 18, 2000.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Cooperman, J.), rendered April 27, 1998, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Lynn W. L. Fahey, New York, N.Y. (Tarik Fouad Ajami of counsel), for appellant.

Richard A. Brown, District Attorney, Kew Gardens, N.Y. (John M. Castellano and Nicoletta J. Caferri of counsel; Daniel J. Melman on the brief), for respondent.

Before: SONDRA MILLER, J.P., WILLIAM D. FRIEDMANN, DANIEL F. LUCIANO, ROBERT W. SCHMIDT, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's contention that his conviction is not supported by legally sufficient evidence is unpreserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05; People v. Johnson, 270 A.D.2d 431). In any event, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the People (see, People v. Contes, 60 N.Y.2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt (see, People v. Johnson, supra). Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict was not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15).

The sentence imposed is not excessive (see, People v. Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80).


Summaries of

People v. Hardeen

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Sep 18, 2000
275 A.D.2d 750 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

People v. Hardeen

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE, ETC., RESPONDENT, v. MARK HARDEEN, APPELLANT . (Ind. No…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Sep 18, 2000

Citations

275 A.D.2d 750 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
713 N.Y.S.2d 497