From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Hallums

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Feb 28, 2018
158 A.D.3d 819 (N.Y. App. Div. 2018)

Opinion

2016–04716 Ind. No. 3470/15

02-28-2018

The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Danny HALLUMS, appellant.

Seymour W. James, Jr., New York, N.Y. (Robin V. Richardson of counsel), for appellant. Eric Gonzalez, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove and Morgan J. Dennehy of counsel; Robert Ho on the memorandum), for respondent.


Seymour W. James, Jr., New York, N.Y. (Robin V. Richardson of counsel), for appellant.

Eric Gonzalez, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove and Morgan J. Dennehy of counsel; Robert Ho on the memorandum), for respondent.

ALAN D. SCHEINKMAN, P.J., REINALDO E. RIVERA, LEONARD B. AUSTIN, JEFFREY A. COHEN, BETSY BARROS, JJ.

DECISION & ORDER

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Elizabeth Foley, J.), imposed March 16, 2016, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

ORDERED that the sentence is affirmed.

The defendant's valid waiver of his right to appeal precludes review of his contention that the sentence imposed was excessive (see People v. Sanders, 25 N.Y.3d 337, 341–342, 12 N.Y.S.3d 593, 34 N.E.3d 344 ; People v. Dorsey, 155 A.D.3d 890, 63 N.Y.S.3d 878 ).

SCHEINKMAN, P.J., RIVERA, AUSTIN, COHEN and BARROS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Hallums

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Feb 28, 2018
158 A.D.3d 819 (N.Y. App. Div. 2018)
Case details for

People v. Hallums

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Danny HALLUMS, appellant.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Feb 28, 2018

Citations

158 A.D.3d 819 (N.Y. App. Div. 2018)
68 N.Y.S.3d 915

Citing Cases

People v. Lawrence

Likewise, the defendant’s contention that the County Court failed to make restitution payable jointly and…

People v. Lawrence

The defendant's contention, in effect, that the sentence was excessive is precluded by her valid waiver of…