From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Hall

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Oct 10, 1991
176 A.D.2d 988 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)

Opinion

October 10, 1991

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Broome County (Monserrate, J.).


The only contention raised by defendant on this appeal is that his sentence was harsh and excessive. However, the prison sentence he received as a second felony offender of 4 1/2 to 9 years was the most lenient sentence authorized (see, Penal Law § 70.06 [b]; [4] [b]) and was in accordance with the plea-bargain agreement. Furthermore, another felony count was dropped as a result of the plea agreement. Under these circumstances, we find no abuse of discretion by Supreme Court in imposing sentence (see, People v. Mackey, 136 A.D.2d 780, lv denied 71 N.Y.2d 899; People v. Gray, 131 A.D.2d 590).

Mahoney, P.J., Weiss, Mercure and Crew III, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.


Summaries of

People v. Hall

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Oct 10, 1991
176 A.D.2d 988 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)
Case details for

People v. Hall

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. ELLIOT HALL, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Oct 10, 1991

Citations

176 A.D.2d 988 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)

Citing Cases

McMillan v. United States Fire Ins. Co.

"2. Necessary household, table and kitchen furniture belonging to the judgment debtor, including one sewing…

Aslett v. Evans

There is sufficient evidence to support the finding that respondent was the owner of four horses, and under…