From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Hager

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Mar 19, 2004
5 A.D.3d 981 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)

Opinion

KA 01-01970.

Decided March 19, 2004.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Ronald H. Tills, A.J.), rendered April 20, 2001. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree.

THE LEGAL AID BUREAU OF BUFFALO, INC., BUFFALO (ROBERT B. HALLBORG, JR., OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

FRANK J. CLARK, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, BUFFALO (DON I. DALLY OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT.

PRESENT: WISNER, J.P., HURLBUTT, SCUDDER, KEHOE, AND HAYES, JJ.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously modified on the law and as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice by reducing the mandatory surcharge to $150 and the crime victim assistance fee to $5 and as modified the judgment is affirmed.

Memorandum: As the People concede, it was a violation of the Ex Post Facto Clause of the Federal Constitution (US Const, art I, § 10 [1]) for Supreme Court to order defendant to pay a mandatory surcharge in the amount of $200 and a crime victim assistance fee of $10, ostensibly pursuant to an amendment to Penal Law § 60.35 (1)(a). Although defendant's criminal conduct occurred on April 6, 2000, after the date that the amendment stated that it was to be effective (April 1, 2000), the amendment was not signed into law until May 15, 2000. Thus, the amendment is inapplicable to defendant's conviction ( see Donnino, Supp Practice Commentaries, McKinney's Cons Laws of NY, Book 39, Penal Law § 60.35, 2004 Pocket Part, at 126; see also People v. Goldwire, 301 A.D.2d 677, 678). We therefore modify the judgment by reducing the mandatory surcharge to $150 and the crime victim assistance fee to $5 ( see People v. Fabela, 240 A.D.2d 677, 678, lv denied 90 N.Y.2d 939; People v. McIntosh, 163 A.D.2d 810; People v. Bethea, 133 A.D.2d 836, 837, lv denied 70 N.Y.2d 929).


Summaries of

People v. Hager

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Mar 19, 2004
5 A.D.3d 981 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
Case details for

People v. Hager

Case Details

Full title:PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. CURTIS HAGER…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Mar 19, 2004

Citations

5 A.D.3d 981 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
773 N.Y.S.2d 317

Citing Cases

People v. Sullivan

Thus, the amendment is inapplicable to defendant's conviction ( see Peoplev. Hager, 5 A.D.3d 981 [Mar. 19,…

People v. Stephen M.

To impose the DNA databank fee under those circumstances would implicate the Ex Post Facto Clause of the…