From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Hadsell

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jan 31, 1992
179 A.D.2d 1030 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

Opinion

January 31, 1992

Appeal from the Ontario County Court, Henry, Jr., J.

Present — Denman, P.J., Pine, Balio, Lawton and Davis, JJ.


Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: We reject defendant's contention that he was deprived of his right to a fair trial by prosecutorial misconduct during the trial (see, People v. Plant, 138 A.D.2d 968, lv denied 71 N.Y.2d 1031; see also, People v. Galloway, 54 N.Y.2d 396). Defendant was not deprived of the effective assistance of counsel. Viewing the circumstances in their totality and as of the time of the representation (see, People v. Baldi, 54 N.Y.2d 137, 147), we conclude that defendant was afforded meaningful representation (see, People v. Anastasi, 177 A.D.2d 952).

We have examined defendant's remaining contentions and find that they do not require reversal.


Summaries of

People v. Hadsell

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jan 31, 1992
179 A.D.2d 1030 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
Case details for

People v. Hadsell

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. ROBERT HADSELL…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Jan 31, 1992

Citations

179 A.D.2d 1030 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)