From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Guzman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
May 10, 2000
272 A.D.2d 883 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

Filed May 10, 2000.

Appeal from Judgment of Ontario County Court, Harvey, J. — Aggravated Harassment of Employee by Inmate.

Judgment unanimously affirmed.

Present: PIGOTT, JR., P. J., GREEN, WISNER AND SCUDDER, JJ.


Memorandum:

Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him of aggravated harassment of an employee by an inmate (Penal Law § 240.32). We reject defendant's contention that County Court erred in admitting in evidence the t-shirt and uniform shirt worn by the correction officer. Although the chain of custody was broken with respect to those items, the People's proof provided reasonable assurances that they were the same as those worn by the correction officer and that their condition was unchanged ( see, People v. Miller, 242 A.D.2d 896, 897, lv denied 91 N.Y.2d 876; People v. Anderson, 99 A.D.2d 560, 561). Any deficiency in the chain of custody affects the weight of the evidence, not its admissibility ( see, People v. Miller, supra, at 897).


Summaries of

People v. Guzman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
May 10, 2000
272 A.D.2d 883 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

People v. Guzman

Case Details

Full title:PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. JULIO S. GUZMAN…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: May 10, 2000

Citations

272 A.D.2d 883 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
709 N.Y.S.2d 715

Citing Cases

People v. Montgomery

d in the normal course of his business, and that he had relied on it in making his examination assessment was…

People v. Dye

We reject the contention of defendant that he was deprived of effective assistance of counsel because defense…