From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Guzman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 14, 1996
227 A.D.2d 219 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

Opinion

May 14, 1996

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Rena Uviller, J.).


There is no showing that the four-year delay in indicting defendant was purposeful or resulted in any prejudice. However, the delay is not in any manner explained and it appears that defendant was readily available throughout this period and fully cooperated with the police investigation. This is a rare case where the length of and lack of justification for the delay are sufficient by themselves to warrant dismissal ( see, e.g., People v. Rodriguez, 205 A.D.2d 417, lv denied 84 N.Y.2d 872; see, People v. Singer, 44 N.Y.2d 241, 253-254).

Concur — Wallach, J.P., Ross, Williams and Mazzarelli, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Guzman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 14, 1996
227 A.D.2d 219 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
Case details for

People v. Guzman

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Appellant, v. ERNANI GUZMAN, Also…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: May 14, 1996

Citations

227 A.D.2d 219 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
642 N.Y.S.2d 269

Citing Cases

People v. Velez

Many of the cases cited by the defense deal with unexplained prosecutorial delays. [See People v. Guzman, 227…

People v. King

Thus, the court finds the pre arrest delay is unexplained and unjustified. (People v Montague, 130 A.D.3d,…