Opinion
2d Crim. No. B287607
07-05-2018
THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. ISAI GUERRERO, Defendant and Appellant.
Adrian Dresel-Velasquez, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant. No appearance for Respondent.
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115. (Super. Ct. No. 2017027471)
(Ventura County)
Isai Guerrero appeals his conviction by jury of carrying a dirk or dagger (Pen. Code, § 21310), possession of a controlled substance (Health & Saf. Code, § 11350, subd. (a)), and possession of drug paraphernalia (Health & Saf. Code, § 11364, subd. (a)). The trial court found that appellant had served a prior prison term (§ 667.5, subd. (b)) and sentenced appellant to three years felony jail. Appellant was ordered to pay a $200 probation investigation fee, a $50 crime lab fee (Health & Saf. Code, § 11372.5), and a $300 restitution fine (§ 1202.4, subd. (b)).
All statutory references are to the Penal code unless otherwise stated. --------
We appointed counsel to represent appellant in this appeal. After counsel's examination of the record, he filed an opening brief in which no issues were raised. On May 17, 2018, we advised appellant that he had 30 days within which to personally submit any contentions or issues he wished us to consider. No response has been received.
The record reflects that appellant was arrested on August 3, 2017, after he attempted to steal a phone through a broken car window. The officer determined that appellant was on probation with search terms and found a large fixed blade knife, 1.1 grams of heroin, a glass smoking pipe on appellant's person, and burglary tools and a .22 caliber round in appellant's backpack.
We have reviewed the entire record and are satisfied that appellant's attorney has fully complied with his responsibilities and that no arguable issues exist. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436, 443; People v. Kelly (2006) 40 Cal.4th 106, 126.)
The judgment is affirmed.
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED.
YEGAN, J. We concur:
GILBERT, P. J.
TANGEMAN, J.
Nancy L. Ayers, Judge
Superior Court County of Ventura
Adrian Dresel-Velasquez, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.
No appearance for Respondent.