Opinion
November 13, 1989
Appeal from the County Court, Nassau County (Thorp, J.).
Ordered that the judgment is modified, on the law and as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, by deleting the provision thereof directing the defendant to make restitution in the amount of $560.84; as so modified, the judgment is affirmed and the matter is remitted to the County Court, Nassau County, for a hearing and new determination concerning the proper amount of restitution and the manner of payment thereof.
The plea record and the presentence report were insufficient to enable the court to determine the proper amount of restitution and, therefore, a hearing was required (see, People v Clougher, 95 A.D.2d 860). "While the [sentencing] court acted properly in employing the Probation Department as a preliminary fact finder to ascertain the appropriate amount of restitution * * * the court should have conducted a hearing upon receipt of the Probation Department's report. Moreover, defendant's failure at the time of sentencing to request a hearing on the issue of restitution did not constitute a forfeiture of his right of review by this court, as the failure to accord him a hearing on that issue constituted a departure from `the "essential nature" of the right to be sentenced as provided by law'" (People v Clougher, supra, at 860).
The defendant's remaining contention is without merit (see, People v Kazepis, 101 A.D.2d 816; People v Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80). Mollen, P.J., Bracken, Lawrence and Rosenblatt, JJ., concur.