From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Grisanti

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jan 23, 1987
126 A.D.2d 938 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)

Opinion

January 23, 1987

Appeal from the Erie County Court, Dillon, J.

Present — Callahan, J.P., Denman, Boomer, Green and Balio, JJ.


Judgment unanimously modified, on the law, and, as modified, affirmed, in accordance with the following memorandum: Defendant pleaded guilty to one count of possession of gambling records in the first degree (Penal Law § 225.20) in full satisfaction of a two-count indictment. The court levied a fine in the sum of $4,500 and sentenced defendant to a term of probation for a period of five years. As one of the conditions of defendant's probation, the court directed that defendant must submit himself to a warrantless search of his person, his residence and his automobile at any time by his probation officer. The People concede that the warrantless search provision of defendant's probationary sentence should be deleted as contrary to law (see, People v. Suttell, 109 A.D.2d 249).

The court properly denied defendant's motion to suppress the items seized from his person in accordance with the terms of a valid search warrant (see, People v. Sanin, 60 N.Y.2d 575).


Summaries of

People v. Grisanti

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jan 23, 1987
126 A.D.2d 938 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)
Case details for

People v. Grisanti

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. FRANK GRISANTI, JR.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Jan 23, 1987

Citations

126 A.D.2d 938 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)

Citing Cases

People v. Sztuk

In all other respects, the charge was proper (see, People v. Canty, 60 N.Y.2d 830; People v. Lytch, 106…

People v. Nephew

In reviewing the merits of this challenge, we find that the condition is not contrary to law (cf., People v…