From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Griffin

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Apr 22, 1965
208 N.E.2d 179 (N.Y. 1965)

Opinion

Argued March 18, 1965

Decided April 22, 1965

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department, MITCHELL D. SCHWEITZER, J.

Kalman Finkel and Anthony F. Marra for appellant.

Frank S. Hogan, District Attorney ( H. Richard Uviller of counsel), for respondent.


MEMORANDUM: We hold that nothing in Jackson v. Denno ( 378 U.S. 368) or People v. Huntley ( 15 N.Y.2d 72) requires this court to overrule our decision in People v. Nicholson ( 11 N.Y.2d 1067) whose holding and reasoning we now approve. (See People v. Rogers, 15 N.Y.2d 690.) The defendant, therefore, is not now entitled to a hearing before the trial court on the issue of the voluntariness of his confession. Nor has any argument been advanced to justify or warrant any change or modification of our conclusion, in People v. Howard ( 12 N.Y.2d 65, 68-69), that retroactive effect is not to be accorded to decisions of this court respecting right to counsel. (See, also, People v. Rogers, 15 N.Y.2d 690, supra.)

The order appealed from should be affirmed.

Chief Judge DESMOND and Judges DYE, FULD, VAN VOORHIS, BURKE, SCILEPPI and BERGAN concur.

Order affirmed.


Summaries of

People v. Griffin

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Apr 22, 1965
208 N.E.2d 179 (N.Y. 1965)
Case details for

People v. Griffin

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. CHARLES GRIFFIN…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Apr 22, 1965

Citations

208 N.E.2d 179 (N.Y. 1965)
208 N.E.2d 179
260 N.Y.S.2d 447

Citing Cases

People v. De Flumer

Nothing developed in the coram nobis hearing indicates the contrary. This situation, except for the age of…

People v. Spicer

May 20, 1968 Order affirmed ( People v. Nicholson, 11 N.Y.2d 1067; see People v. Griffin, 16 N.Y.2d 508).…