From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Gregory

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 30, 1996
223 A.D.2d 503 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

Opinion

January 30, 1996

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Herbert Altman, J.).


The sentencing court properly denied defendant's application for substitution of counsel, the plea minutes belying his conclusory claim that his attorney did not fully apprise him of the consequences of pleading guilty ( see, People v Braun, 167 A.D.2d 164). Nor should defendant's sentence be reduced in the interest of justice. When he failed to perform under a cooperation agreement, the court, by the terms of that agreement, was no longer bound to impose the promised sentence. The sentence ultimately imposed reflects the gravity of defendant's crimes ( see, People v Mickens, 215 A.D.2d 322, lv denied 86 N.Y.2d 798).

Concur — Rosenberger, J.P., Rubin, Kupferman, Nardelli and Tom, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Gregory

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 30, 1996
223 A.D.2d 503 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
Case details for

People v. Gregory

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. LARHONE GREGORY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jan 30, 1996

Citations

223 A.D.2d 503 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
637 N.Y.S.2d 372

Citing Cases

People v. Paige

Accordingly, defendant has no cause to complain that the sentence imposed is excessive (see, People v.…

People v. Kloczkowski

The record supports the County Court's conclusion that the defendant's recantation and breach of the…