From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Green

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 27, 1994
205 A.D.2d 800 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

June 27, 1994

Appeal from the County Court, Dutchess County (King, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The People were not required to serve the defendant with a notice pursuant to CPL 710.30. Neither Investigator Joseph nor Trooper Hilts had participated in a pretrial identification procedure within the meaning of that statute (see, People v Rodriguez, 79 N.Y.2d 445, 450; People v. Gissendanner, 48 N.Y.2d 543, 552; People v. McClane, 149 A.D.2d 536; People v. Crespo, 111 A.D.2d 251).

The defendant's sentence was not excessive and should not be disturbed (see, People v. Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80).

We have examined the defendant's remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Thompson, J.P., Rosenblatt, Miller and Ritter, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Green

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 27, 1994
205 A.D.2d 800 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

People v. Green

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. LARRY GREEN, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 27, 1994

Citations

205 A.D.2d 800 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
614 N.Y.S.2d 925

Citing Cases

People v. Smith

05[2]; People v Clinkscales, 171 AD3d 1086; People v Thomas, 168 AD3d 766) and, in any event, without merit…