From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Graham

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 8, 1985
110 A.D.2d 715 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)

Opinion

April 8, 1985

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Brennan, J.).


Judgment affirmed.

We note that the issues raised by defendant concerning her plea of guilty were not presented to the court of first instance in a motion to withdraw the plea or by way of a motion to vacate the judgment. Accordingly, those issues have not been preserved for review ( see, People v. Pellegrino, 60 N.Y.2d 636; People v Willie, 101 A.D.2d 819). However, we have considered the issues and find no basis for the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction.

Regarding defendant's sentence, which she claims is excessive, she pleaded guilty with the understanding that she would receive the sentence which was thereafter actually imposed. On this record, defendant has no basis to now complain that her sentence was excessive. Lazer, J.P., Gibbons, Thompson and Niehoff, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Graham

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 8, 1985
110 A.D.2d 715 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)
Case details for

People v. Graham

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. SHARON GRAHAM…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 8, 1985

Citations

110 A.D.2d 715 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)

Citing Cases

People v. Brandow

The sole contention on appeal is that the sentence was unduly harsh. We disagree. Defendant pleaded guilty…